Current-site audit
Review of structure, content, URLs and major usability issues.
A redesign should solve identified problems rather than simply apply a new colour scheme. Techatam reviews content, URLs, navigation, enquiry paths and technical constraints before deciding what should be retained, rewritten or rebuilt.
We begin with business objectives, audiences, page responsibility and operational constraints. Visual design follows the agreed structure so the website remains useful after launch.
A redesign should solve identified problems rather than simply apply a new colour scheme. Techatam reviews content, URLs, navigation, enquiry paths and technical constraints before deciding what should be retained, rewritten or rebuilt.
The final scope depends on the existing website, content readiness, integrations, approvals and the level of ongoing support required. These points are clarified before work begins.
Deliverables are selected according to the project rather than forced into a fixed package.
Review of structure, content, URLs and major usability issues.
Identification of valuable pages, links and assets.
Improved navigation and page responsibilities.
Rewriting and consolidation recommendations.
Old-to-new URL plan and migration redirects when changes are unavoidable.
Checks for links, metadata, forms, analytics and indexability.
We inspect the existing site and clarify business priorities.
Pages are marked retain, improve, merge or remove.
A revised sitemap and navigation are approved.
New page templates and components are created.
Content, metadata and redirects are implemented.
Indexing, errors and key conversion paths are checked.
Brand assets, service details, current access, content sources, target customers, policy information, integration credentials and an authorised reviewer may be required.
Testimonials, performance claims, client names and statistics are used only when supplied and approved. Missing facts are not fabricated to fill a design.
Final cost, timing and responsibilities are confirmed after reviewing the exact requirement.
It can if URLs, content or internal links change. Careful mapping, technical SEO checks and redirects reduce avoidable risk.
Useful and accurate content can be retained, but weak or duplicated sections may need improvement.
Yes. Large sites can be prioritised by template or business importance.
A homepage-only change is possible, but inconsistent internal pages may limit the benefit.
Yes, when the migration is planned around URLs, content and functionality.
We will review the requirement and recommend a practical scope instead of adding unnecessary features.